Pages

Friday 13 December 2013

Death Threats And The Finite Spiral of Anonymous Self Destruction

The CSIRO’s third annual climate change survey showed that roughly one in five people don’t think climate change is happening. About 42% of people believe humans have no influence on climate change. People seem disconnected from the science underpinning climate change.

It's unsurprising, then, that efforts to scuttle renewable technologies do not manifest grandiosity, intellect or ethics. Seemingly, all you need a laptop, an internet connection, and a darkly zealous will to inflict harm.

Well-connected anti-wind activists are nothing new. Their primary purpose is to inject clouds of pollution into the discourse surrounding wind farms, and recently this effort has been spearheaded by an anonymous online group unironically named 'Stop These Things'.

They were brought online on December 26th 2012, and in June this year, they organised a poorly-attended but well-behaved protest outside parliament house. They've published posts quite regularly since their inception, and it's worth examining their modus operandi, and whether they've had any impact on the world of renewable energy.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The clandestine authors of 'Stop These Things' have been buoyed by anonymity - naming and abusing members of the wind industry (including racist abuse directed at myself), with no fear of identification or responsibility (they also upload testimony from individuals who state their health problems are caused by wind farms, footage they term 'victim impact statements', unnervingly reminiscent of the anti-vaccination lobby's 'reaction report forms').

Anonymous cyber-bullying is being used to fight renewable energy. Image source: thisisbeirut.wordpress.com

The content posted online is far removed from the mild-mannered protest in June. The author openly denigrates the policy director of the Clean Energy Council Russell Marsh with the taunt 'Herr Marsh of the Stasi'. In another post, they liken their hatred of wind energy to Winston Churchill's fight against Nazi Germany. The word 'greentard' has been used to describe supporters of wind farms, and recently, they've shifted to exclusively using the term 'wind weasel'. 

The language used in the posts is adopted instantly by the commenters. Image source: stopthesethings.com

Recent polling by Essential Media showed huge support for wind energy as a technology for generating electricity. It's likely you're among the 17,000,000 Australians who are are 'greentards'.

The anonymous moderators of ‘Stop These Things’ also publish comments threatening to kill and assault supporters of wind energy, and employees of the wind industry. 

Many of the comments on the site unambiguously advocate inflicting violence on wind industry employees. Image source: stopthesethings.com

The anti-wind rally held in June should have been a boost for 'Stop These Things'. Onlookers might have expected a rabble of absurd claims and abuse, but largely, they got no such thing (with a couple of exceptions). Several prominent figures spoke at the June 18th anti-wind rally. They including Senator John Madigan, Angus Taylor, Senator Ron Boswell, Craig Kelly and Alan Jones. Nick Xenophon, originally scheduled to speak on the day, pulled out the night before the rally.

Nick Xenophon saw a significant backlash on Twitter and Facebook after he had originally agreed to speak at the rally. Image source: stopthesethings.com

Media coverage looked at both the anti-wind rally and the pro-renewables rally held in Garema place at the same time. The event certainly netted a fair amount of traffic for the website.

The media comprised a significant portion of the attendees of the rally. Image source: Stop These Things Flickr

We can quantify the impact of the coverage relatively easily. The blog has been archived 12 different times by the 'Wayback Machine', each of which includes a snapshot of the hit counter posted on their front page. By collating these and calculating the number of new hits since each archive, we can get a clear idea of how the hit rate rose at the time of the rally and consequently fell sharply:

The raw data can be found in this spreadsheet

On top of this obvious decline, Alexa, an internet ranking service, states that the website is 'down 2,223,843' spots in the global page rank, has a 'Bounce Rate' increase of 124%, a 'Daily Pageviews Per Visitor' decrease of 64% and a 'Time on Site' decrease of 52%.

These data from Alexa.com compare stopthesethings.com to a Justin Bieber fan site. Note that the scale on the left is logarithmic, meaning the dark blue line is an orders of magnitude lower than the light blue.

The rally was an opportunity for the bloggers to acquire a fresh audience. The only thing 'Stop These Things' stopped was return visits. Why? Isn't outrage an effective campaigning tool?

Not when it goes too far. Anonymous death threats are reprehensible to most people, including those who have concerns about the aesthetic, acoustic and environmental effects of wind energy. Though anonymity may enable the authors to pen fierce invective about people working in the wind industry, Stop These Things alienated all but the most righteous of wind energy opponents, motivated enough to relish savage vitriol.

Much of the content intentionally relates acts of violence with mentions of companies and individuals

The author regularly suggests that pro-wind commentators commit suicide
......and follows up on these suggestions months later

Their reliance on attempting to induce outrage through threat and insult has led them down a steep trajectory. The anonymous author now avoids any semblance of insinuation and pens direct death threats, the below an example of a response posted to Susan Richmond, the administrator of the anti-wind 'Waubra Foundation':



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last year, I discussed James Delingpole’s odious description of the wind industry as a ‘paedophile ring’. Since then, the Australian Press Council upheld a complaint against Delingpole and The Australian, forcing them to publish the full text of their ruling. Julian Disney, chairman of the APC, gave evidence to the Senate hearing on media reform on March 19, 2013.

“Vitriol, intimidation, character assassination, that is an abuse which has a number of weaknesses but one of them is that it actually inhibits genuine freedom of expression.....To distort, to provide people with unreliable information, to excessively abuse and intimidate, is amongst other things an attack on freedom of expression.”

‘Stop These Things’ exists to stifle discourse and replace calm deliberation with anger, outrage and emotion - what Disney describes as “an attack on freedom of expression”. The authors may be successful in their aim to inspire anger, violence and vitriol in their followers, but in parallel they alienate those who find that technique reprehensible. Most visitors to their site aren't motivated to return.

It's been a good year for wind energy. Victoria's second community wind farm, the Coonooer Bridge Wind Farm, was approved, pioneering a share ownership model. The NSW Renewable Energy Action Plan reiterated the need to ensure the community is completely invested in the development of renewable assets in their region. The gaps that remain between hearts and minds of those looking to develop renewable energy sources, and those who might live amongst them, are narrowing, enabled by the free flow of information and Disney's 'freedom of expression'.

'Stop These Things' have succeeded only in eroding their own audience, through an ever-intensifying descent into repetitive, illogical and meaningless abuse. Their efforts to decay freedom of expression and pollute discourse have failed. 

Tuesday 3 December 2013

Trump Fails to Notice Infographic Disproves Point He's Trying to Make; Hilarity Ensues

Donald Trump seriously hates wind turbines. Cynics might attribute this to the legal action he's commenced against an offshore wind farm planned near his proposed luxury golf resort in Scotland, a resort plagued by opposition from the local community. Sheath your suspicion, friends. His fury is utterly selfless.
"Please understand that I am not fighting this proposal merely for the benefit of Trump International Golf Links. Instead I am fighting for the benefit of Scotland"
Trump's effort to shield Scotland from the apocalyptic scourge of electrical energy captured from atmospheric movement has drawn him to place an ad comparing wind farms to terrorism, and (allegedly) place another ad offering to pay people $20 USD to “stand next to or behind the... elected officials/celebrities that will be speaking at the [anti-wind] rally”.

Donald's hair, which has a 73% stake in all his decisions, also hates wind

A few days ago, Trump trumped the selflessness of these acts by tweeting an infographic demonstrating the dangers of exposure to wind turbines, to his 2,444,053 followers:


(Tweet preserved here for posterity)

If that infographic looks familiar, it's because I made it, and posted it a few months ago. The reason I made it was to demonstrate the outcomes of over-reliance on anecdotal evidence. Click here for a large version. I even included the following quote, to make the purpose of the graphic utterly unambiguous:
"Thinking anecdotally comes naturally; whereas thinking scientifically does not"
- Michael Shermer
So how did Trump get fooled by small print? He was tweeted the picture by a guy called Dan Scavino Junior, General Manager of 'Trump Golf":


Turns out the GM of Trump Golf cares as much about infrasonic emissions as Trump does. It's genuinely fascinating to see my infographic, originally intended to demonstrate the logical fallacy of relying too heavily on personal testimony, used as evidence by Trump, and the GM of his golf enterprise. It demonstrates perfectly Trump's desire to find surrogate causes to stuff the blatant, gaping holes that stem from the fact his hatred of wind energy comes not from a genuine concern for Scottish welfare, but from a single specific development, barely visible from his planned luxury golf course.

s
The offshore wind farm has broad support - picture via this

This happens a lot on Twitter. People furiously working to build the foundations for an idea they've already hoisted higher than it deserves don't notice detail or nuance; they retweet and share with starry dreams of virulence, and a quiet, nervous hope that no one pays too much attention. In this case, Trump tweeting my infographic shows, quite beautifully and comically, that he'll even quote evidence that directly demonstrates the fallacy he's adopting. I'm a little proud to be the originator of this ironic morsel of accidental accuracy.

A pro-wind protestor brings The Donald the closest he's ever come to understanding electricity, via this